Session 1: Digital Age, Technology and future in High Education
This session explores crucial
topic which is using of technology and future of High Education. The session
meets two of the ED403’s important CLOs which are Review and apply theoretical
framework and models for Technology enabled Learning (CLO1) and critically
review and analyse trends in higher education learning environment (CLO2).
Issues in teaching in a digital age
I would like to begin this blog
discussing the Issues in teaching in a digital age.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant influence on digital
learning, leading to changes in patterns and the introduction of novel
educational methodologies. The pandemic had a rapid and sometimes challenging
effect on the educational system, but it also encouraged the growth and
development of digital learning (Bansal et al, 2021). Despite significant
advancements in digital and online learning, including the use of video
conferencing, online learning platforms, the Learning Management System (Moodle),
and administrative tools, there are still challenges associated with digital
learning (Chang et al., 2009).
Several challenges associated with digital learning include: The concept
of the digital divide refers to the unequal access to and use of digital
technologies and the internet among different groups of people. It highlights
the disparities in access to information and communication technologies (ICTs)
based on factors such as income, education, geographic location, and social
status. Unequal access to digital devices and high-speed internet exists among
students throughout the Pacific region. This discrepancy may result in
substantial disparities in educational opportunities and achievements. I have
visited Solomon Islands, Samoa, Tonga, and Vanuatu for various initiatives,
where we have assessed the speed and expenses of internet connectivity.
Internet speed exhibits significant variation across different countries (Guppy
et al., 2022).
The varying levels of digital literacy among both students and teachers
contribute to a skills gap. Teachers must demonstrate proficiency not just in
their own areas of expertise but also in successfully using and teaching with
technology. Extensive study has been conducted on digital literacy, revealing
significant challenges in the Pacific region. The lack of tangible cues and
limited interactions in a virtual context may provide significant hurdles to
engagement and motivation. Indeed, this holds true for my classes, since
students are ineligible to enroll in online courses. Ongoing training and
support are essential for instructors to stay up-to-date with the latest
technology and digital teaching methodologies (Sarah et al., 2022).
Technology-enabled learning
This session further explores new items in technology enables learning. The three theoretical framework and models for technology enabled learning are:
- Community of Inquiry (CoI)
- Technology Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK)
- Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
Community of Inquiry (CoI)
We’re starting here because using
technology for learning means setting a foundation for new ways of thinking
about teaching and learning (Fiock,
2020). CoI, or Community of Inquiry, is an educational approach that
emphasizes collaborative learning and the use of technology to enhance
connection and cooperation.
Technology improves connection and
cooperation for meaningful learning in CoI. Everyone feels secure
sharing/exchanging ideas in CoI. The idea is to develop knowledge. It then
discusses social, cognitive, and instructional presence.
To improve social presence,
relate to people in the community, share information and ideas, and establish
open communication.
Cognitive Presence, learner's
ability to develop and communicate ideas inside CoI. This has 4 steps: The
learning process includes responding to a trigger, exploring a new thought,
integrating it into one's own environment, and resolving/accepting the notion.
Teaching Presence - the
facilitator/teacher contact with students contains three elements: Design,
facilitation, and direct teaching.
Some resources:
Community of Inquiry Model: A Conceptual Framework for Online Learning Research
Summarizing the Community of Inquiry Model
Technology Pedagogy and Content Knowledge (TPACK)
TRACK is a framework that identifies the
knowledge teachers need to teach their subject effectively with technology. Technology
TPACK is pedagogy and content knowledge.
TPACK defines the knowledge teachers
need to effectively use technology. Three main types of knowledge make up
TPACK: Content, Pedagogy and Technology.
TPACK builds on these three main knowledge bases and adds four additional, as listed below:
- Pedagogical-Content knowledge is how to teach a topic.
- Technological-content knowledge is how to employ technology for a certain topic.
- Understanding how to incorporate technology into education is technological-pedagogical knowledge.
- Technological-Pedagogical-Content knowledge includes how to use technology to teach certain subjects.
These four knowledge sources provide
additional technology-integration approaches for instructors.
TPACK: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework.
Introduction to the TPACK Model.
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM)
TIM illustrates how teachers can use
technology to enhance or enable learning for K (Kindergarten) to class/grade 12
students and beyond i.e. post-secondary/university students (Koehler and Mishra, 2009; Harris and
Yearta, 2020). Combines environmental factors with educational technologies.
TIM has five interdependent relevant learning environment characteristics:
Active, Constructive, Goal-directed, Authentic, Collaboration
Five
technological integration levels are associated with TIM: Entry, Adoption,
Adaption, Infusion, Transformation
Introduction to the Technology
Integration Matrix - Dr. James Welsh: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REByCgv1eyE
What is the Technology Integration
Matrix? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4I4YlPD2ecs
Technology Integration Matrix (TIM) and TIM Tools Introduction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyN9l5LK5uM
Some tools I used in my courses.
Higher education is using technology more and more, so
teachers need to know how to use simple tech tools and be happy with tech tools
that aren't related to their subject (Renes and Strange, 2011). Digital
literacy and digital skills are still hard for students and teachers in the
Pacific (Reddy et al., 2022). This is a big problem. In recent years, USP and
my field of computer science have been taught in both mixed and online formats.
This is possible thanks to new technologies like Moodle, which hosts all the
material and allows for online evaluation, and class Capture and Zoom, which
allow for live class delivery. Online tools and learning have changed the way
people learn and will be the future of education in the Pacific (Sharma, 2008).
There are a lot of engaging ways to learn online. I use discussion boards,
current SCORM packages, online quizzes and polls, and a lot more in my classes.
It is important for online courses to have test tools that keep students
interested and help them learn at the same time. Online learning has also made
it easier to learn and less expensive because it lets people learn from
anywhere and at their own pace.
Some important resources on Digital A:
Ebook: teaching in a Digital Age: https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m/
Teaching in a Digital Age : Guidelines for Designing
Teaching and Learning: https://openlibrary-repo.ecampusontario.ca/jspui/handle/123456789/276
Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203117422/teaching-learning-digital-age-louise-starkey
Teaching in the Digital Age: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqBr7Q6ai4E
kills Needed in a Digital Age: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LeeOuQx-_w
Re-inventing Education for the Digital Age: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArI6albrkuY
Teaching in a Digital Age: How Educators Use Technology to
Improve Student Learning: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856?casa_token=W2SIk8Ug5IAAAAAA%3AF_vVq2tXSi47ldUQOqWSVgwoCFV0HHCzxxWq7rk4Efs4pZhXYeeJtVPg5IwM1TQwPYdLsi2E-OxM0g
Top 10 VR Apps for Education: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTawujvVzJ4
References:
Bansal, R., Gupta, A., Singh, R., & Nassa, V. K. (2021, July). Role and impact of digital technologies in E-learning amidst COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021 Fourth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT) (pp. 194-202). IEEE.
Chang, C. Y., & Wang, H. C. (2009). Issues of inquiry learning in digital learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 169-173.
Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, L., Tai, J., & Bartolic, S. (2022). The post‐COVID‐19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1750-1765.
Sarah, C., Jane, B., Rónán, O. B., & Ben, R. (2004). Quality assurance for digital learning object repositories: issues for the metadata creation process. ALT-J, 12(1), 5-20.
Fiock,
H. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1),
135-153.
Koehler,
M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content
knowledge (TPACK)?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher
education, 9(1), 60-70.
Harris,
L., & Yearta, L. (2020, April). The UDL, TPACK, and TIM frameworks to
evaluate pre-service teacher technology integration. In Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp.
2010-2016). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Renes,
S. L., & Strange, A. T. (2011). Using technology to enhance higher
education. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 203-213.
Reddy,
P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2022). Digital literacy: a review in the
South Pacific. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1),
83-108.
Sharma,
A. N. (2008). ICT in teacher education: The USP experience. Pacific
education: Issues and perspectives, 165-179.
Comments
Post a Comment